Introduction. The article addresses the issue of designing complex architectural forms in modern sacred architecture, with a focus on structural feasibility and engineering analysis. It highlights the importance of building structures as a key factor enabling the implementation of unconventional spatial solutions within real-world construction conditions. The relevance of a comprehensive approach to form-making is emphasized — one that encompasses both the architectural concept and precise engineering analysis.
Problem Statement. The lack of unified methodologies for modeling, analysis, and regulatory frameworks for the design of complex structural systems creates challenges in the practical realization of innovative architectural forms. This is particularly relevant in the field of sacred architecture, where visual expression must be structurally justified.
Purpose of the Article. To outline the prospects of modern structural design of complex forms using examples from sacred architecture, and to substantiate the need for updated approaches to structural analysis, typology, and regulatory standards.
Materials and Methods. The study employs the method of analyzing implemented architectural- structural solutions in sacred construction, tools for parametric and geometric modeling (Grasshopper, Rhino), software for FEM analysis (LIRA-SAPR, SCAD Office, Karamba3D), a review of current regulations, and comparative engineering calculations. The typology of modern structures and principles of their adaptation to complex forms are considered.
Results. By comparing traditional and parametric dome structures, the study demonstrates the impact of geometry on stress-strain behavior and material consumption. Approaches to panelization, development of connection nodes, reinforcement optimization, and consideration of thermal-deformation effects are proposed. Key limitations of the current regulatory framework are identified, along with suggestions for its revision.
Conclusions. Complex architectural forms cannot be realized without thorough engineering analysis and interdisciplinary collaboration. Next-generation building structures enable a synthesis of aesthetics, durability, and technological efficiency, but they require a reassessment of the normative and methodological foundations of design. The findings may be valuable for designers, researchers, and developers of modern building codes.
