Complex coefficient for assessing the condition of the road surface

published:
Number: Issue 30(2024)
Section: Construction and civil engineering
The page spacing of the article: 122-137
Keywords: road and airfield pavement, deformations, destruction, degree of development, condition assessment
How to quote an article: Igor Gameliak, Vitaliy Raykovskiy. Complex coefficient for assessing the condition of the road surface. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2024. Issue 30. P. 122–137 [in Ukrainian].

Authors

National Transport University (NTU), Kyiv, Ukrainе
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9246-7561
State Enterprise “National Institute for Development Infrastructure” (SE “NIDI”), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6391-7647

Summary

Introduction. This article deals with the issue of reviewing existing methods and approaches to assessing the condition of the road pavement and proposes a methodology for assessing the condition of the road pavement using a complex indicator. This indicator is used to analyze the defects and destruction of the pavement determined by the visual method.

Problem. The need to improve the methodology for assessing the condition of the road surface (rigid, non-rigid) by calculating the coefficient by which the designer or balance holder can assess the condition of the existing pavement.

The purpose of the article. To inform road industry specialists about new trends and developments in the field of road pavement inspection of roads and airfields.

Materials and methods. SE “NIDI” (DerzhdorNDI SE), National Transport University and current construction norms and standards of Ukraine, materials of foreign regulatory documents and technical literature on pavement condition assessment were used in the article.

Conclusions. According to the analysis, a methodology for calculating a complex coefficient for assessing the condition of the pavement, taking into account the degree of damage to the pavement, which should be used as an additional tool for assigning the type of repair work, is proposed.

References

  1. Pavement management system. Report prepared by an OECD scientific expert group. Paris. 1987. 159 р. [in English].
  2. Praticò, Filippo G., Paolo G. Briante, and Clara Celauro. Modelling pavement surface characteristics for noise prediction through Bailey-related indicators. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology. 14.2 (2021). P. 222–231 [in English].
  3. Matlack, Glenn R., et al. Measuring surface texture of in-service asphalt pavement: Evaluation of two proposed hand-portable methods. Road Materials and Pavement Design. 24.2 (2023). P. 592–608 [in English].
  4. Underwood, B. Shane, Y. Richard Kim, and J. Corley-Lay. Assessment of use of automated distress survey methods for network-level pavement management. Journal of performance of constructed facilities. 25.3 (2011). P. 250–258 [in English].
  5. White, Greg, et al. Developing a framework for diagnosis of shear distress in asphalt surfaces. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. 18.12 (2017). P. 1039–1051 [in English].
  6. Gulyas A. Surface Distress Assessment / Routes & Report, 1991, 1. No. 301, P. 15–30.
  7. Raikovskyi V.F,. Udoskonalennia metodu rozrakhunku nadiinosti nezhorstkoho dorozhnoho odiahu pry dii navantazhennia (Improvement of the method of calculating the reliability of non-rigid road clothing under load). Avtoref. dys. … kand. tekhn. nauk. Kyiv, 2021. 24 p. [in Ukrainian].
  8. Obstezhennia poshkodzhen. Kerivnytstvo protseduramy Viziroad (Inspection of damages. Guide to Viziroad /Ingeroute procedures) /Ingeroute, Viziroad Proc V3A, 23 p. [in Ukrainian].
  9. DSTU 8954:2019 Avtomobilni dorohy. Otsiniuvannia rivnia defektnosti dorozhnoho odiahu. Roads. Evaluation of the level of defectiveness of road clothing [in Ukrainian].
  10. PIARC World Road Association, Surface Characteristics, Report of the Commitee. XXth World Road Congress. Ref.PIARC 20.01.B, Montreal, 1995, 102 p. [in English].
  11. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature. 521(7553). P. 436–444 [in English].
  12. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2012). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Communications of the ACM. 60(6). P. 84–90. [in English].
  13. Gonzalez, R. C., & Woods, R. E. (2008). Digital Image Processing (3rd ed.). Pearson Education [in English].
  14. Shahin, M. Y. (2005). Pavement Management for Airports, Roads, and Parking Lots. Springer [in English].
  15. AASHTO (1993). Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials [in English].
  16. Al-Omari, B., & Darter, M. I. (1994). Relationships Between International Roughness Index and Present Serviceability Rating. Transportation Research Record. 1435. P. 130–136 [in English].
  17. Miller, J. S., & Bellinger, W. Y. (2003). Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program (Fourth Revised Edition). Federal Highway Administration [in English].
  18. Shahin, M. Y., & Kohn, S. D. (1981). Pavement maintenance management for roads and streets using the pavement condition index. Construction Engineering Research Laboratory [in English].
  19. Ceylan, H et al. (2013). Highway Infrastructure Health Monitoring Using Micro-Electromechanical Sensors and Systems (MEMS). Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. Vol. 19, Issue 1. Р. 188–201 [in English].
  20. Zhou, Z et al. (2012). Optical fiber Bragg grating sensor assembly for 3D strain monitoring and its case study in highway pavement. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. Vol. 28. P. 36–49 [in English].
  21. Zhou, D et al. (2014). Feasibility of water seepage monitoring in concrete with embedded smart aggregates by P-wave travel time measurement. Smart Materials and Structures. Vol. 23, No. 6 [in English].
  22. Zhang, B et al. (2014). Crack width monitoring of concrete structures based on smart film. Smart Materials and Structures. Vol. 23. No. 4 [in English].