Crisis phenomena and the strategic role of anti-crisis management in the restoration of small and medium businesses in Ukraine

published:
Number: Issue 33(2026)
Section: Economy. Management
The page spacing of the article: 49-63
Keywords: risk management, digitalization of business processes, economic stability, sustainable development, institutional environment, strategic planning, war economy, relocation of enterprises, business models.
How to quote an article: Liliia Lytvyshko. Crisis phenomena and the strategic role of anti-crisis management in the restoration of small and medium businesses in Ukraine. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2026. Issue 33. P. 49–63 [in Ukrainian].

Authors

National Transport University (NTU), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9315-046X

Summary

Introduction. Amid a full-scale war and profound socio-economic changes in Ukraine, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face heightened vulnerability to crises. Destruction of production and transport infrastructure, interruptions in supply chains, restricted financial resources, workforce displacement, and the escalation of cyber risks all create significant challenges for business operations. In this context, effective crisis management becomes essential for facilitating adaptation, maintaining stability, and restoring entrepreneurial activity. The integration of crisis management strategies with digital transformation initiatives and governmental support mechanisms has given rise to innovative approaches for guiding the development and resilience of SMEs.

Problems. Military and economic instability further intensifies the difficulties confronting SMEs, resulting in financial volatility, decreased liquidity, market losses, organizational disarray, and an increased likelihood of bankruptcy. Simultaneously, the current government support mechanisms demonstrate limited effectiveness, largely due to institutional constraints and administrative obstacles.

Purpose. This research seeks to examine the present condition and development challenges of SMEs in Ukraine amid a wartime crisis, evaluate the contribution of crisis management and the efficiency of governmental support mechanisms, and outline prospective pathways for their sustainable growth.

Materials and methods of research. The investigation draws upon the scholarly work of both domestic and international researchers in crisis management, official statistics from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine, relevant legislative documents, and strategic policy plans of government authorities. The study utilizes methods including analysis and synthesis, systemic and structural approaches, comparative evaluation, generalization, statistical data processing, as well as logical and visual modeling techniques

Results. The research indicates that SMEs in Ukraine are functioning amid significant uncertainty, constrained financial resources, logistical challenges, and heightened operational risks. Despite these difficulties, enterprises exhibit considerable adaptability by relocating operations, modifying business models, reorienting product lines, and actively adopting digital technologies. The study underscores the practical value of implementing comprehensive crisis management strategies. In addition, governmental and international support mechanisms for SMEs were examined, revealing their positive contribution to maintaining entrepreneurial activity, while also exposing limitations related to fragmentation, restricted accessibility, and procedural complexity. The analysis further identifies potential pathways for the development of SMEs in the post-crisis period.

Conclusions. Small and medium-sized enterprises in Ukraine function in an environment characterized by high volatility and risk, yet they demonstrate substantial capacity for adaptation through business model adjustments, relocation, and digital transformation. Effective crisis management is essential for maintaining organizational resilience and long-term viability. The future growth of SMEs will largely depend on the alignment of government policies, the availability of financial resources, the efficiency of institutional support, and Ukraine’s integration into the European economic framework.

References

  1. W. Timothy Coombs. Coombs, W.T. Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: the development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 2017. No. 10(3). Р. 163–176 [in English]
  2. Commander S. Navaneetha Krishnan, L. S. Ganesh, C. Rajendran. Entrepreneurial Interventions for crisis management: Lessons from the Covid-19 Pandemic's impact on entrepreneurial ventures. International journal of disaster risk reduction. 2022. No. 45, Р. 203–215 [in English].
  3. Robert R Rothberg. Managing crises before they happen: what every executive needs to know about crisis management. Journal of Product Innovation Management. No. 19(1). Р. 103–105 [in English].
  4. Babina N.O. Antykryzovyi finansovyi kontrolinh yak faktor zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva. Efektyvna ekonomika. 2019. No. 5 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Kryvov’iaziuk I. V. Antykryzove upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom : navch. posib. 3-tie vydannia. Kyiv, 2020. 396 p. [in Ukrainian].
  6. Levkοvets N. P. Udoskonalennia antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom v umovakh voiennoho stanu. Visnyk PDAU, Ekonomika, upravlinnia ta finansy. Poltava, 2024. Issue 2 [in Ukrainian].
  7. Lozhachevska O. M., Pidvalna O. H., Mokhonko H. A. Biznes-administruvannia mekhanizmu antykryzovoho upravlinnia finansamy innovatsiino oriientovanykh pidpryiemstv v umovakh didzhytalizatsii ta rozvytku publichnoho upravlinnia. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid. Kyiv, 2023. Issue 24. P. 30–34 [in Ukrainian].
  8. H. Igor Ansoff, Edward J. McDonnell. Implanting strategic management. Prentice Hall. 1990. 520 р. [in Ukrainian].
  9. Kryvov’iaziuk I.V. Antykryzove upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom v umovakh viiny: zahalna kharakterystyka y poshuk rishen shchodo dotsilnosti yoho zaprovadzhennia. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo. Odesa, 2025. No. 78. P. 1–11 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Lihonenko L. O., Tarasiuk M. V., Khilenko O. V. Antykryzove upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom: navch. posib. Kyiv, 2015. 377 p. [in Ukrainian].
  11. Vavdiichyk I. M., Kondratiuk O. I., Stoianenko I. V. Antykryzove upravlinnia yak stratehichnyi instrument zabezpechennia staloho rozvytku pidpryiemstv torhivli. Molodyi vchenyi. Odesa, 2025. Issue 4 (135) [in Ukrainian].
  12. Skibitska L. I, Matvieiev V. V., Shchelkunov V. I., Podreza S. M. Antykryzove upravlinnia: navch. posib. Kyiv, 2013. 527 p. [in Ukrainian].
  13. Tereshchenko O.O. Antykryzove finansove upravlinnia na pidpryiemstvi: navch. posib. Kyiv, 2004. 560 p. [in Ukrainian].
  14. Pro osoblyvosti rehuliuvannia diialnosti yurydychnykh osib okremykh orhanizatsiino-pravovykh form u perekhidnyi period ta obiednan yurydychnykh osib: Zakon Ukrainy vid 09.01.2025 No. 4196-IX, redaktsiia vid 12.12.2025 No. 4585-IX // Baza danykh Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy / Verkhovna rada Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4196-20#Text (data zvernennia: 15.01.2026) [in Ukrainian].
  15. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Zareiestrovani sub’iekty hospodariuvannia v Ukraini. URL: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/menu/menu_u/sze_20.htm  (data zvernennia: 15.01.2026) [in Ukrainian].
  16. Lytvyshko L.O., Tetirko V.O., Zaika Yu.L., Luhovtsov A.S. Upravlinnia ryzykamy yak kliuchovyi element antykryzovoho stratehichnoho planuvannia biznesu ta pidpryiemstv v umovakh viiny. Visnyk Natsionalnoho transportnoho universytetu. Kyiv, 2025. No. 60(1). P. 169–181 [in Ukrainian].

17.  Eurostat. Micro & small businesses make up 99% of enterprises in the EU. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20241025-1 (data zvernennia: 15.01.2026) [in Ukrainian].

18.  Pidtrymka ekonomiky ta biznesu u biudzheti-2026: investytsii, kredytuvannia, innovatsii ta enerhoefektyvnist. Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy, 2025. URL: https://mof.gov.ua/uk/news/pidtrimka_ ekonomiki_ta_biznesu_u_biudzheti-2026_investitsii_kredituvannia_innovatsii_ta_energoefektivnist-5505  (data zvernennia: 15.01.2026) [in Ukrainian].

19.  Pro rozvytok ta derzhavnu pidtrymku maloho i serednoho pidpryiemnytstva v Ukraini: Zakon Ukrainy vid 22.03.2012  No. 4618-VI, redaktsiia vid 28.08.2025 No. 4618-VI // Baza danykh Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy / Verkhovna rada Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4618-17#Text  (data zvernennia: 15.01.2026) [in Ukrainian].

20.  Stratehiia vidnovlennia, staloho rozvytku ta tsyfrovoi transformatsii maloho i serednoho pidpryiemnytstva na period do 2027 roku ta operatsiinyi plan zakhodiv na 2024-2027 roky: Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 30.08.2024 No. 821-r, redaktsiia vid 30.08.2024 No. 821-2024-r // Baza danykh Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy / Verkhovna rada Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/821-2024-%D1%80#Text  (data zvernennia: 15.01.2026) [in Ukrainian].

21.  Natsionalna ekonomichna stratehiia do 2030 roku: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 03.03.2021 No. 179, redaktsiia vid 04.05.2023 No. 179-2021-p // Baza danykh Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy / Verkhovna rada Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/179-2021-%D0%BF#Text  (data zvernennia: 15.01.2026) [in Ukrainian].

22.  Problemy rozvytku maloho ta serednoho biznesu v Ukraini yak osnovnoho dzherela robochykh mists. Natsionalnyi instytut stratehichnykh doslidzhen, 2024. URL: https://niss.gov.ua/ doslidzhennya/sotsialna-polityka/problemy-rozvytku-maloho-ta-serednoho-biznesu-v-ukrayini-yak (data zvernennia: 15.01.2026) [in Ukrainian].

23.  Podatkova reforma – 2025 z elementamy vyzhyvannia. 7eminar, 2025. URL: https://7eminar.ua/news/9218-pidsumki-tiznya-1606-20062025  (data zvernennia: 15.01.2026) [in Ukrainian].