Current challenges in the management of ukraine’s bridge infrastructure

published:
Number: Issue 32(2025)
Section: Hydrotechnical construction, water engineering and water technology
The page spacing of the article: 180-193
Keywords: road, bridge, load capacity, restoration, testing, prioritization, development strategy, inspection, technical condition, infrastructure management.
How to quote an article: Artem Bezuglіy, Volodymyr Kaskiv, Serhii Zavgorodnyi. Current challenges in the management of ukraine’s bridge infrastructure. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2025. Issue 32. P. 180–193 [in Ukrainian].

Authors

State Enterprise «National Institute for Development Іnfrastructure» (SE «NIDI»), Kyiv, Ukraine
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3883-7968
State Enterprise «National Institute for Development Іnfrastructure» (SE «NIDI»), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1928-4544
State Enterprise «National Institute for Development Іnfrastructure» (SE «NIDI»), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8074-6798

Summary

Introduction. The article examines the current challenges of bridge management in Ukraine under the conditions of infrastructure aging and increasing traffic loads. The assessment of the technical condition of bridges is becoming especially important in the context of road safety, economic stability, and national defense.

Problem Statement. Most bridges in Ukraine have been in service for more than fifty years, which has led to a decrease in their designed load capacity and the accumulation of structural defects. The lack of a systematic national modernization program complicates the effective planning of repairs and reconstructions. Similar challenges have previously arisen in developed countries that implemented large-scale infrastructure programs for bridge rehabilitation.

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to analyze international experience in bridge management, particularly the examples of the United States and Germany, and to develop recommendations for creating a national strategy for bridge renewal in Ukraine.

Materials and Methods. The study uses statistical data on the condition of bridges on national highways of Ukraine, the results of inspections and testing, information from official reports of the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and the German Ministry of Transport, as well as analytical sources and scientific publications devoted to the assessment of transport structures.

Results. Based on the analysis of international practices, the key elements of an effective bridge management strategy have been identified, including systematic technical inspections, prioritization of works according to technical condition and transport importance, and stable funding based on long-term planning. It has been shown that the approaches of the United States and Germany differ in scale and implementation pace but share a common foundation — reliability of data and consistency in management decisions.

Conclusion. The current state of Ukraine’s bridge infrastructure requires the introduction of a systematic management approach based on inspection results and scientifically grounded prioritization. The implementation of a program similar to the American and German models will help improve traffic safety, ensure efficient use of resources, and support the gradual renewal of bridges in the post-war period.

References

  1. Volodymyr Kaskiv, Liudmyla Panibratets, Serhii Stepanov, Vladyslava Hriniv, Leonida Chaikovska. State of bridge facilities of ukraine on public roads of national importance in the controlled territories in 2023. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2024. Issue 29. P. 280–292  DOI: https://doi.org/10.36100/ dorogimosti2024.29.280 [in Ukrainian].
  2. MR V.2.3-37641918-921:2021 Metodychni rekomendatsii z vyznachennia vantazhopidiomnosti avtodorozhnikh mostiv [Methodical Recommendations (MR V.2.3-37641918-921:2021) Guidelines for determining the load-carrying capacity of highway bridges]. Kyiv, 2021. 48 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  3. DBN V.2.3-6:2009 Sporudy transportu. Mosty ta truby. Obstezhennia i vyprobuvannia [State Building Norms (DBN V.2.3-6:2009) Transport facilities. Bridges and pipes. Inspection and testing]. Kyiv, 2009. 73 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  4. DBN V.2.3-22:2009 Sporudy transportu. Mosty ta truby. Osnovni vymohy proektuvannia [State Building Code of Ukraine (DBN V.2.3-22:2009) Transport facilities. Bridges and culverts. Basic design requirements]. Kyiv, 2009. 40 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  5. DSTU 9181:2022 Sporudy transportu. Nastanova z otsiniuvannia i prohnozuvannia tekhnichnoho stanu avtodorozhnikh mostiv [State Standard of Ukraine (DSTU 9181:2022) Transport buildings. Instructions for assessing and forecasting the technical condition of road bridges]. Kyiv. 2022. 121 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  6. DSTU 8748:2017 Nastanova shchodo provedennia dynamichnykh vyprobuvan avtodorozhnikh mostiv [State Standard of Ukraine (DSTU 8748:2017) Guidelines for dynamic testing of road bridges]. Kyiv, 2018. 22 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  7. DSTU 9123:2021 Nastanova z obstezhennia ta vyprobuvannia mostiv i trub [State Standard of Ukraine (DSTU 9123:2021) Guidelines for the inspection and testing of bridges and pipes]. Kyiv, 2022. 43 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  8. DSTU 9280:2024 Nastanova shchodo provedennia statychnykh vyprobuvan avtodorozhnikh mostiv [State Standard of Ukraine (DSTU 9280:2024) Guidelines for the static testing of highway bridges]. Kyiv, 2024. 23 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  9. Matos, J.C., Nicoletti, V., Casas, J. R., & Adey, B. T. (2023). Comparison of condition
    rating systems for bridges in three European countries. Applied Sciences, 13(22), 12343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app132212343 [in English].
  10. Lamei, A., Hasan, M.M., Shaaban, S., El-Badawy, S., & Mostafa, T. (2025). Development of performance-based deterioration models for bridge components. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 10, 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-025-02025-7 [in English].
  11. de Vries, R., Li, Y., & Casas, J. R. (2023). Proof load testing method by the American
    Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO). Transportation Research Record, 2677(5), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231165026 [in English].
  12. de Vries, R., Yang, S., Liu, H., & Casas, J. R. (2023). Time-dependent reliability assessment of existing concrete bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 19(11), 1451–1465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.228 0712 [in English].
  13. Gocál, J., Odrobiňák, J. (2020). On the influence of corrosion on the load-carrying capacity of old riveted bridges. Materials, 13(3), 717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030717 [in English].
  14. Dvořák, L., Králik, J., Vican, J. (2021). Determination of road bridge load-carrying capacity. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 17(1), 368–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2021-0030 [in English].
  15. Faber, M.H., Sørensen, J.D., Bucher, C. (2000). Proof load testing for bridge assessment and upgrading. Engineering Structures, 22(10), 1421–1430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00111-X [in English].
  16. Cai, Y., Yang, W., Liu, H., Yang, S., Li, Y. (2024). Comprehensive durability assessment of in-service concrete bridges. SN Applied Sciences, 6(5), 250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06250-0 [in English].
  17. Council of State Governments. (2021). Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act: Roads and Bridges. Retrieved from URL: https://web.csg.org/recovery/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2021/11/Analysis-for-States-Roads-and-Bridges_web.pdf (Accessed: 02.10.2025) [in English].
  18. Public Law 117-58. (2021). Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. 117th Congress of the United States. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from URL: https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ58/PLAW-117publ58.pdf (Accessed: 02.10.2025) [in English].
  19. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (2024). Condition of U.S. Highway Bridges. U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved from URL: https://www.bts.gov/ content/condition-us-highway-bridges (Accessed: 02.10.2025) [in English].
  20. American Society of Civil Engineers. (2021). Structurally Deficient Bridges — 2021 Infrastructure Report Card. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from URL: https://2021.infrastructurereportcard. org/cat-item/bridges-infrastructure (Accessed: 02.10.2025) [in English].
  21. Congressional Research Service. (2022). Highway Bridges: Conditions, Funding Programs, and Issues (Report R47194). Washington, D.C. Retrieved from. URL: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47194 (Accessed: 02.10.2025) [in English].
  22. Bundesministerium für Digitales und Verkehr. (2020). Brückenmodernisierung. Berlin. URL: https://www.bmv.de/SharedDocs/DE/Artikel/StB/ brueckenmodernisierung.html (Last accessed: 02.10.2025) [in German].
  23. Bundesrechnungshof. (2021). Langsame Sanierung maroder Bundesfernstraßenbrücken (Slow refurbishment of dilapidated federal trunk road bridges). Bonn. URL: https://www.bundesrechnungshof.de/SharedDocs/ Downloads/EN/Berichte/brueckenmodernisierung-volltext.pdf (Last accessed: 02.10.2025) [in German] [in English].
  24. Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur. (2020). Brückenmodernisierungs programm 2020–2030 (Bridge Modernisation Programme 2020–2030). Berlin. URL: https://www.bmv.de/SharedDocs/ Downloads/DE/brueckenmodernisierung-programm-2020-2030.pdf (Last accessed: 02.10.2025) [in German].
  25. Artem Bezuglіy, Volodymyr Kaskiv, Liudmyla Panibratets, Sergii Stepanov, Vladyslava Hriniv, Leonida Chaikovska. Determination of priority inspection and repair urgency of transport structures using the software complex «Analytical expert system for bridge management». Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2025. Issue 31. P. 171–179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36100/ dorogimosti2025.31.171 [in Ukrainian].