Development and improvement of methods of calculation of deformation of irregular rule forms and fundamentals of river structures under the action of flood flows

published:
Number: Issue 25(2022)
Section: Hydrotechnical construction, water engineering and water technology
The page spacing of the article: 132–148
Keywords: deformation, bottom soil, bridge, flood, erosion, rule, flow, numerical method
How to quote an article: Iryna Bashkevych, Yurii Yevseichyk, Andrii Koretskyi, Artur Onyshchenko, Borys Оstroverh, Liudmila Potapenko. Development and improvement of methods of calculation of deformation of irregular rule forms and fundamentals of river structures under the action of flood flows. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2022. Iss. 25. P. 132–148 [in Ukrainian].

Authors

National Transport University, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-0306
National Transport University (NTU), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1040-4530
National Transport University, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3373-5535
National Transport University, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7640-4317
Institute of Hydromechanic of NAS Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1303-7801
National Transport University (NTU), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3507-4734

Summary

Introduction. The article presents the results of the study of irregular bottom river forms and foundations of structures, as well as coastal forms under the action of surface channel currents. It is assumed that the development of channels occurs due to the action of natural hydromorphodynamic river processes during the long stages of rivers existence formed in accordance with topographic, geological and hydrometeorological conditions.
Problem Statement. Flow velocities are determined by a system of equations for the kinematics of channel flows and sediment transport, which is built on the basis of averaging the depth of flow.
Purpose. Application of the developed methods of solving problems in the spatial dimension for the study of turbulent effects in the interaction with structural elements. The development of methods for applying the spatial model will be carried out at the next stage.
Methods of research. Differential equations describing a nonstationary depth-averaged flow are solved using the FST2DH numerical model, which implements the finite element method. The steps typically performed when using FST2DH to study surface water flow and sediment transportation require the general necessary geographic information systems to build a network and assign boundary conditions. The equations for calculating channel erosion and erosion of bridge piers in bound soils are also considered, where it is shown that erosion depends more on soil properties than for the case of incoherent sediments, but can reach the same erosion depths with longer multi-flood calculations hydrographs.
Results. Calculations of the flow kinematics of the calculated floodplain on the example of crossing the floodplain along the highway showed that the presence of a large angle of the overpass to the flood flow leads to additional conditions for increasing local erosion of supports in the form of solid rectangular columns. Significant local erosion is observed in the area of supports near the channel part.
Conclusion. Based on the calculations and analysis of the kinematics and hydromorphodynamics of flows in the area of the designed bridge, recommendations on the necessary layout and design protective measures have been developed.

 

References

  1. Ostroverkh B.M., Khomytskyi V.V. Rozvytok teorii i metodiv modeliuvannia ruslovykh protsesiv v Instytuti hidromekhaniky NAN Ukrainy. Prykladna hidromekhanika. Kyiv, 2007. Tom 9, № 2-3. P. 139–149. URL: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/4706/10-Ostroverkh.pdf?sequence=1 (Last accessed: 20.01.2022) [in Ukrainian].
  2. Ostroverkh B.N., Potapenko L.S. Chyslenyi analyz hydromorfolohycheskykh protsessov s yspolzovanyem vichyslytelnikh y heoynformatsyonikh system. Materialy piatoi mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (29-30 veresnia 2016, Kyiv). Kyiv, 2016. P. 42–44 [in Ukrainian]..
  3. Vizualizatsiia techii na nakhylenoiu ovalnoiu lunkoiu. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vladimir-Voskoboinick/publication/308628162_Vizualizacia_tecii_nad_nahilenou_ovalnou_lunkou/links/57e929be08aef8bfcc9602ae/Vizualizacia-tecii-nad-nahilenou-ovalnou-lunkou.pdf (Last accessed: 20.01.2022) [in Ukrainian].
  4. Hryshanyn V.K. Teoryia ruslovoho protsessa. Moscow, 1972. 216 p. [in Russian].
  5. Mylyteev A. N., Bazarov D. R. Dvumernye (v plane) uravnenyia dlia razmuvaemukh rusel. Soobshchenyia po prykladnoi matematike. Moscow, 1997. 18 p. [in Russian].
  6. Mylyteev A. N., Bazarov D. R. Matematycheskaia model dlia rascheta dvumernykh (v plane) deformatsii rusel. Vodnue resursu. Moscow, 1999. T. 26, № 1. P. 22–26 [in Russian].
  7. Briaud J.L., Chen H.C., Li Y., Nurtjahyo P., Wang J. Pier and Contraction Scour in Cohesive Soils. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, 2004, NCHRP Report 516, Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/13774 [in English].
  8. Slavinska, O., Tsynka А., Bashkevych, I. (2020). Predicting deformations in the area of impact exerted by a bridge crossing based on the proposed mathematical model of a floodplain flow. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (7 (106), 75–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.208634 [in English].
  9. H. Shan, J. Shen, R. Kilgore, K. Kerenyi Scour in Cohesive Soils. Report No. FHWA-HRT-15-033 2015. URL: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/bridge/15033/15033.pdf (Last accessed: 20.01.2022) [in English].
  10. Churuksaeva V.V., Starchenko A.V. A mathematical model and numerical method for computation of a turbulent river stream. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics. Tomsk St. Univ, 2015.6 (38). P. 100–114. URL: https://publons.com/publon/29723436/ (Last accessed: 20.01.2022) [in English].
  11. Guidance for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping. Coastal Water Levels. FEMA Report, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Office of Risk Assessment, Federal Insurance Administration, Washington, 2016. 31 p. [in English].
  12. URL: https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-02/Coastal_Water_Levels_Guidance_May_2016.pdf (Last accessed: 20.01.2022) [in English].
  13. Tolhurst, T. J., K. S. Black, S. A. Shayler, S. Mather, I. Black, K. Baker, and D. M. Paterson. Measuring the in situ Erosion Shear Stress of intertidal sediments with the cohesive strength meter (CSM). Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci, 1999. № 49(2). Р. 281–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1999.0512 [in English].
  14. Grabowski, R. C., G. Wharton, G. R. Davies, and I. G. Droppo. Spatial and temporal variations in the erosion threshold of fine riverbed sediments. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2012. № 12(7). Р. 1174–1188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-012-0534-9 [in English].
  15. L.A. Arneson, L.W. Zevenbergen, P.F. Lagasse, P.E. Clopper Armanini, A., and Di Silvio, G. A one-dimensional model for transport of a sediment mixture in non-equilibrium conditions. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1988. № 26(3), P. 275–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688809499212 [in English].
  16. Froehlich, D. C. Analysis of on-site measurements of scour at piers. Proceedings of the 1988 National Conference on Hydraulic Engineering, Colorado Springs, Colorado, August 15-19, 1988, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY, P. 826–831. URL: https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70014448 (Last accessed: 20.01.2022) [in English].
  17. Нецик М. В., Гасьеквич В. Г. Торфові ґрунти Малого Полісся : монографія. Львів, 2015. С. 198.
  18. Tuukkanen, T., H. Marttila, and B. Klove. Effect of soil properties on peat erosion and suspended sediment delivery in drained peatlands. Water Resources Research, 2014. № 50. Р. 3523–3535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015206 [in English].
  19. Tolhurst T.J. et alt. A comparison and measurement standardisation of four in situ devices for determining the erosion shear stress of intertidal sediments. Continental Shelf Research, 2000. № 20. Р. 1397–1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(00)00029-7 [in English].