Values models identification of syncretic methodology in improvement context in self-managed organizations

published:
Number: Issue 29 (2024)
Section: Economy. Management
The page spacing of the article: 47-57
Keywords: infrastructure restoration projects, program and project management, value-oriented management, syncretic methodology, self-managed organization, set model.
How to quote an article: Andrii Ivko. Values models identification of syncretic methodology in improvement context in self-managed organizations. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2024. Issue 29. P. 47–57 [in Ukrainian].

Authors

State Agency for Restoration and Development of Infrastructure of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3388-8355

Summary

Introduction. The recovery of Ukraine from the consequences of the full-scale aggression of the russian federation requires the development of new scientific approaches to the implementation of restoration projects, programs and portfolios. Modern research on project and program management includes the direction of value-oriented management, the implementation of which increases the accuracy and flexibility of the management system, increases the probability of the project's success in achieving its goals and meeting the specified limitations. At the same time, the syncretic methodology that is being created to manage infrastructure restoration projects is not sufficiently developed in the direction of using value approaches. Therefore, scientific task of applying value-oriented management within the syncretic methodology of infrastructure restoration project management is relevant.

Problem statement. The problem of implementation of self-managed restoration projects using the syncretic project management methodology is described. The need to develop a syncretic methodology for such projects is emphasized. The importance of applying value-oriented management within syncretic project management methodology is founded. The scientific task of developing value management models of the restoration project implemented by a self-managed organization using syncretic project management methodology has been formulated.

Purpose. Development of value models for use by self-managed organizations in restoration projects, which will use the syncretic methodology as the one that best meets the modern challenges of the field of infrastructure restoration in Ukraine.

Materials and methods. To achieve the goal, the following models and methods were used: research of literary sources, methods of analysis and synthesis, models and methods of classification and structuring, models of set theory, optimization methods. Materials for the analysis were projects and restoration portfolios, the implementation of which is overseen by the State Agency for the Restoration of Infrastructure of Ukraine (SARDI).

The results. A model of P2M-like classification of values of restoration projects implemented by self-managed organizations using syncretic project management methodology is proposed. Two types of values have been added to the known features of the classification - restoration values and syncretism values. Thanks to this expansion, the classification model acquires more completeness, which allows to take into account more differentiated values and more accurately implement value-oriented management in the context of the studied projects. A model of four-vector classification of values is also proposed, based on the specifics of the studied projects. Four vectors of values are defined in the model - values of stakeholders, values of syncretism, values of self-management, values of effectiveness. This model represents a three-level structure of values "vector-type-value" and provides further development of the value approach. Identification of the main stakeholders of the studied type of projects was carried out. On the basis of the above models, the set model of the total value of a restoration project implemented by a self-managed organization using the syncretic project management methodology is proposed.

Conclusions. Reconstruction of Ukraine's infrastructure is a complex, complex and unique practical task that requires the development of new scientific approaches for its effective implementation. Within the scope of the proposed syncretic approach, this article develops models of value-oriented management for use by self-managed organizations in infrastructure restoration projects in Ukraine. The use of these models is intended to streamline and systematize the management system of restoration projects and increase its transparency, flexibility and efficiency. A SWOT analysis of the proposed models was conducted, which proved the prospects of the studied approaches. Prospects for further research in the chosen direction are outlined.

References

  1. Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 21 kvitnya 2022 №266/2022 «Pitannya Nazionalnoi rady z vidnovlennya Ukrainy vid naslidkiv viyny» (The issue of the National Council for the Recovery of Ukraine from the Consequences of the War). Kyiv, 2022. URL: https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/2662022-42225 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Ivko A. V. Approaches of syncretic management in road infrastructure restoration projects. Visnyk National Transport University. Series «Technical sciences». Scientific journal. Kyiv, 2022. National Transport University, Issue 3 (53). Р. 433–442 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Ivko A. V. Models of the project management system for the development of self-managed organizations in the portfolios of infrastructure renewal projects of Ukraine. Roads and bridges. Kyiv, 2023. Issue 28. Р. 28–37 [in English].
  4. Kerzner H. Using the Project Management Maturity Model. Strategic Planning for Project Management. Third Edition. Wiley, 2019 [in English].
  5. The Standard for Project Management and a Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition. USA, Project Management Institute, 2021. 250 p. [in English].
  6. PRINCE2® 7 Managing Successful Projects. Global Best Practice. PeopleCert, 2023. 347 p. ISBN 978-9925344604 [in English].
  7. Rigby D. Doing Agile Right: Transformation Without Chaos / Darrell Rigby, Sarah Elk, Steve Berez. Harvard Business Review Press, 2020. 256 p. [in English].
  8. Orenga-Roglá S. and Chalmeta R. Methodology for the implementation of knowledge management systems 2.0. Business & Information Systems, Springer, 2019. Vol. 61, Issue 2, Р. 195–213 [in English].
  9. Haruta V. S., Karun O. V. Development of a knowledge base for the integration of project management methodologies. Bulletin of the National Technical University «KhPI». Ser.: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management: coll. of sci. papers. Kharkiv, 2023.  NTU «KhPI», No. 1 (7), Р. 81–92 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Kononenko, I., Kpodjedo, M., Morhun, A., & Oliinyk, M. Information technology for choosing the project portfolio management approach and the optimal level of maturity of an organization. Radioelectronic and Computer Systems, 2022. Issue 4, P. 173–190. URL: https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2022.4.14 (Last accessed: 11.02.2024) [in English].
  11. Guida D. (2024) When Grit is Not Enough: An Entrepreneur's Playbook for Taking Your Business to the Next Level. River Grove Books, 320 p. [in English].
  12. Flynn J. R., Sternberg R. J. Environmental effects on intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human intelligence: An introduction, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2020. P. 253–278 [in English].
  13. Gillier T., Hooge S., Piat G. Framing value management for creative projects: An expansive perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 2005. Volume 33, Issue 4, P. 947–960 [in English].
  14. Medvedieva O.M. Value-oriented management of interaction in projects: methodological substances: author's abstract dissertation of Doctor tech. sciences: 05.13.22, Kyiv national university construction and architecture, Kyiv. 2013. 44 p. [in Ukrainian].
  15. Marushchak, I. A. Models of the project of territorial development of project-oriented organizations with principle of valuable approach. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 2018. Issue 34, P. 51–57 [in Ukrainian].
  16. Bushuyev S. Puziichuk A. Development organizational structure for value-oriented reengineering project of construction enterprises. 2021 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), 22-25 September, Lviv, Ukraine, 2021. Vol. 2, P. 367–370. URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9648758. (Last accessed: 15.02.2024) [in English].
  17. Frederic Laloux (2014) Reinventing Organisations: A Guide to Creating Organisations Inspired by the Next Stage of Human Consciousness. Nelson Parker. February 9, 382 p. [in English]
  18. Mamoli S. (2019) Holacracy for humans. The InfoQ eMag, Issue 71, May, P. 10–17 [in English].
  19. Brian J. Robertson How are holacracy-powered organizations different? Holacracy Foundation. 2020. URL: https://www.holacracy.org/explore/why-practice-holacracy (Last accessed: 16.02.2024) [in English].
  20. Kononenko I., Kpodjedo M. The Basics of the Project Portfolio Management Generalized Body of Knowledge. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop IT Project Management (ITPM 2021), Slavsko, Lviv region, Ukraine, February 16-18, 2021. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org), Vol. 2851. P. 271–282 [in English].
  21. Kulikov O. M. Modern approaches to project portfolio management in the field of road construction / O. M. Kulikov, O. V. Zayats, L. P. Oksamitna // Bulletin of the National Technical University «KhPI». Ser.: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management: coll. of sci. papers. Kharkiv: NTU «KhPI». 2023. No. 1 (7). P. 42–50 [in Ukrainian].
  22. Kramskyі S., Zakharchenko O. (2022). Organization model of managing the stages of implementation of the infrastructures project and program. Management of Development of Complex  Systems, 2022. Issue 52. P. 28–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2022.52.28-34 [in Ukrainian].
  23. Hansen S., Too E., Le T. (2019). Criteria to consider in selecting and prioritizing infrastructure projects. MATEC Web of Conferences, 270, 06004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/ matecconf/201927006004 [in English].
  24. Hansen S., Suryadibrata A., Hansun S. Infrastructure project selection automation  using non-structural fuzzy decision support system II. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2023. No. 3 (121), P. 46-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023. 271822 [in English].