Lane narrowing as a traffic calming strategy

published:
Number: Issue 32(2025)
Section: Transport technology
The page spacing of the article: 302-313
Keywords: accident rate, highway, road accident, speed, traffic lane width.
How to quote an article: Liudmila Nahrebelna, Tetiana Kostrulyova, Denis Shpin, Alina Korchevskaya. Lane narrowing as a traffic calming strategy. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2025. Issue 32. P. 302–313 [in Ukrainian].

Authors

State Enterprise «National Institute for Development Іnfrastructure» (SE «NIDI»), Kyiv, Ukrain
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8245-9891
State Enterprise «National Institute for Development Іnfrastructure» (SE «NIDI»), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0779-5558
State Enterprise «National Institute for Development Іnfrastructure» (SE «NIDI»), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5615-9075
State Enterprise «National Institute for Development Іnfrastructure» (SE «NIDI»), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9554-1285

Summary

Introduction. In an effort to improve road safety and enhance the quality of the urban environment, designers are increasingly using strategies known as “traffic calming”. One of the most common techniques in this context is narrowing the width of traffic lanes. The idea is that narrower lanes force drivers to intuitively slow down, potentially reducing the risk of traffic accidents.

According to the psychology of driver behavior, the width of the roadway affects the perception of speed and the feeling of safety. Narrower lanes cause higher levels of stress, forcing drivers to be more cautious, while wide lanes encourage higher speeds, even in urban environments.

The problem. One of the most cost-effective and flexible tools is lane narrowing. However, discussions about the optimal width have been going on for decades.

Until 2015, most engineers and scientists recommended lanes between 3.3 m and 3.6 m wide, even in cities. Recent studies suggest reducing lane width to (2.7–3.0) m, but not everyone agrees, citing the “risk of collisions”.

Objective. To investigate the impact of lane width on road safety.

Materials and methods. Empirical and theoretical methods were used in the study.

Results. A study was conducted on the impact of lane width on traffic flow speed and the occurrence of traffic accidents. The width of traffic lanes on motorways in Ukraine and other countries was analyzed. It was proven that it is identical in most European countries, as well as in Ukraine. The width of traffic lanes varies between 3.75 and 3.00 m.

Conclusions. Therefore, the optimal option when choosing the width of a traffic lane is a lane width of 3 m. It is this width, in this case, that will ensure the safe movement of vehicles. It has been proven that reducing the width of a traffic lane in order to force drivers to reduce their speed is relevant and effective only within city limits. On public highways of national importance, where there is constant traffic of heavy vehicles, narrowing the width of traffic lanes is inappropriate.

References

  1. Zvuzhennia dorih: yak u sviti skorochuiut smertnist (Road narrowing: how the world is reducing mortality) DW 20.08.2018iu.    URL: https://www.dw.com/uk/%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%B6%D1%87%D1%96-%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%94-%D0%B1%D0% B5%D0%B7%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%BD%D1%96%D1%88%D1%96-%D1%8F%D0%BA-%D1%83-%D1%94%D1%81-%D1%96-%D1%81%D0%B2% D1%96%D1%82%D1%96-%D0%B7%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%88% D1%83%D1%8E%D1%82%D1%8C-%D1%81%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80% D1%82%D0%BD%D1%96%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C-%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%85/a-45109430 data zverennia: 01.10.2025) [in Ukrainian].
  2. URL: https://www.scribd.com/document/619975894/AASHTO-2018-Greenbook (date of application: 01.10.2025) [in English].
  3. URL: https://n-somerset.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2022-02/E12%20-%20 highways%20development%20design%20guide.pdf  (date of application) [in English]. (date of application: 01.10.2025) [in English].
  4. URL: https://www.scribd.com/document/723292509/1999-Geometric-Design-Guide-for-Canadian-Roads-various-sections  (date of application: 01.10.2025) [in English].
  5. Sami Mecheri, Florence Rosey, Régis Lobjois, The effects of lane width, shoulder width, and road cross-sectional reallocation on drivers’ behavioral adaptations. July 2017. Accident Analysis & Prevention 104(6): 65–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.019. Електронний ресурс: URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316780904_The_effects_of_lane_ width_shoulder_width_and_road_cross-sectional_reallocation_on_drivers’ _behavioral_adaptations (date of application: 01.10.2025) [in English].
  6. Ahmed, M.; Huang, H.; Abdel-Aty, M.; Guevara, B. Exploring a Bayesian Hierarchical Approach for Developing Safety Performance Functions for a Mountainous Freeway. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2011, 43, 1581–1589 [in English].
  7. Pande, A.; Abdel-Aty, M. A Novel Approach for Analyzing Severe Crash Patterns on Multilane Highways. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2009, 41, 985–994 [in English].
  8. Zhu, H.; Dixon, K.K.; Washington, S.; Jared, D.M. Predicting Single-Vehicle Fatal Crashes for Two-Lane Rural Highways in Southeastern United States. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2010, 2147, 88–96 [in English].
  9. Nowakowska, M.Logistic Models in Crash Severity Classification Based on Road Characteristics. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2010, 2148, 16–26 [in English].
  10. Gårder, P. Segment Characteristics and Severity of Head-on Crashes on Two-Lane Rural Highways in Maine. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2006, 38, 652–661 [in English].
  11. Dumbaugh,E.Design of Safe Urban Roadsides. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2006, 1961, 74–82 [in English].
  12. Potts, I.B.; Harwood, D.W.; Richard, K.R. Relationship of Lane Width to Safety on Urban and Suburban Arterials. Transp. Res. Rec. 2007, 2023, 63–82 [in English].
  13. Hauer, E.; Council, F.M.; Mohammedshah, Y. Safety Models for Urban Four-Lane Undivided Road Segments. Transp. Res. Rec. 2004, 1897, 96–105 [in English].
  14.  Strathman, J.G.; Dueker, K.J.; Zhang, J.; Williams, T. Analysis of Design Attributes and Crashes on the Oregon Highway System; Oregon Department of Transportation: Salem, OR, USA, 2001; Volume 2 [in English].
  15. URL: https://life.pravda.com.ua/society/2016/11/12/219942/  (date of application: 01.10.2025) [in English].
  16. DBN V.2.3-4:2015 Avtomobilni dorohy. Chastyna 1. Bdivnytstvo. Chastyna 2. Proiektuvannia (DBN V.2.3-4:2015 Motorways. Part 1. Construction. Part 2. Design). Kyiv, 2025. 53 р. (Informatsiia ta dokumentatsiia) [in Ukrainian].
  17. DBN V.2.3-5:2001 Vulytsi ta dorohy naselenykh punktiv. Vymohy do proiektuvannia (DBN V.2.3-5:2001 Streets and roads in populated areas. Design requirements). Kyiv, 2001. 45 р. (Informatsiia ta dokumentatsiia) [in Ukrainian].
  18. URL: https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/geometric/pubs/mitigationstrategies/chapter3/3_ lanewidth.cf (date of application: 01.10.2025) [in English].
  19. URL: https://www.toi.no/getfile.php/1367214-1630046228/Publikasjoner/T%C3% 98I%20rapporter/2021/1831-2021/1831-2021_summary.pdf (date of application: 01.10.2025) [in English].
  20. Gross, F., Donnell, E.T., 2011. Case – control and cross-sectional methods for estimating crash modifiation factors: comparisons from roadway lighting and lane and shoulder width safety effct studies. J. Safety Res. 42, 117–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2011.03.003 [in English].
  21. Gooch, J.P., Gayah, V.V., Donnell, E.T., 2016. Quantifying the safety effcts of horizontal curves on two-way, two-lane rural roads. Accid. Anal. Prev. 92, 71–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.aap.2016.03.024 [in English].
  22. Lee, Ch., Abdel-Aty, M., Park, J., Wang, J.-H., 2015. Development of crash modification factors for changing lane width on roadway segments using generalized nonlinear models. Accid. Anal. Prev. 76, 83–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.01.007 [in English].
  23. Gitelman, V., Doveh, E., Carmel, R., Hakkert, S., 2019. The inflence of shoulder characteristics on the safety level of two-lane roads: a case-study. Accid. Anal. Prev. 122, 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.10.003 [in English].
  24. Petr Pokorny, Jan K. Jensen, Frank Gross, Kelly Pitera Safety effcts of traff lane and shoulder widths on two-lane undivided rural roads: A matched case-control study from Norway. Accident Analysis & Prevention Volume 144, September 2020, 105614 URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000145752030 3006?via%3Dihub [in English].
  25. URL: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/10053/10053.pdf (date of application: 01.10.2025) [in English].
  26. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277590178_Narrower_Lanes_Safer _Streets (date of application: 01.10.2025) [in English].