Basic technical principles of wildlife crossings

published:
Number: Issue 22(2020)
Section: Environmental protection technologies
The page spacing of the article: 234-248
Keywords: highway (road)ecoducts, biodiversity, (wildlifecrossing), transport infrastructure, landscape fragmentation
How to quote an article: Kostiantyn Medvediev, Anatolii Morozov, Tetiana Morozova, Inessa Rutkovska, Viktoriia Khrutba Basic technical principles of wildlife crossings // Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2020. Iss. 22. P. 234-248 [in Ukrainian].

Authors

National Transport University, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5596-6193
National Transport University, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7832-4222
National Transport University, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0704-7093
National Transport University, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4836-1035
National Transport University, Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8121-2042

Summary

Introduction. Ensuring further economic growth and social change in Ukraine involves the development of the road network and its infrastructure in accordance with European requirements.  Infrastructure that ensures the efficient functioning of the road industry includes directly the road network and structures on it, including bridges, overpasses, landscape bridges, wildlife crossings, etc.).  Each of these components has a local negative impact on the environment, while the impact of infrastructure as a whole is regional and sometimes global.

Problem Statement. It is difficult to assess the impact of individual components of transport infrastructure on wildlife, as the transport network creates new factors of influence for animals, often they can not adapt to them. When laying roads, usually a larger area of land resources is withdrawn from circulation than is required for the roadway itself.  At the same time, natural habitats of animals are destroyed (due to the felling of trees, shrubs, drainage of swamps, backfilling of reservoirs).  When substantiating design decisions, the basic estimates are possible damage to hunting and endangered species, industrial and valuable fish species, and agricultural production. Laying the road through migration routes is also a matter of traffic safety, as mass migration can impede traffic and endanger people’s lives.  This is important not only for large animals (danger of collision), but also for small members of the fauna (loss of control, increased braking distance). A characteristic feature of vehicle collisions with animals is their concentration on small sections of roads (0.6‒0.8 km).  The places of the most frequent collisions coincide with the sections passing in zero marks, embankments 2.0‒2.5 m high and excavations of the same depth, have gentle slopes.  According to experts, the number of collisions with animals in the total number of accidents does not exceed 2‒4%.  The number of injured passengers is 20‒25, deaths — 2‒3 per 100 collisions with animals for which the collisions are fatal (Rubtsov, 2017).  To ensure the conservation of biodiversity and the safety of road users, it is to prevent collisions with animals and, in our case, to avoid road construction or reconstruction where possible.  When this is not possible, it is necessary to provide for the creation of structures for animals to cross roads (Gavrilenko, 2017).  Thus, the problem of minimizing risks for both fauna and traffic through the construction of wildlife crossings and fences around the perimeter for the movement of fauna across highways is relevant.

Purpose. Provide basic technical characteristics for the design of wildlife crossings and perimeter fences that will facilitate the movement of fauna across roads with risk minimization for both fauna and traffic.

Materials and methods. The main research methods are the application of theoretical general scientific approaches to the study of urban objects: analysis and synthesis of international and domestic scientific and theoretical works, EU documentation (charters, design requirements), Ukrainian legal framework, literature sources;  collection and analysis of statistical data to identify the dangers of the impact of road infrastructure on biodiversity and determine the value of the natural landscape of wildlife crossings.

Results. The result is a systematization of the basic technical principles of wildlife crossing design, methodological approaches and practical recommendations, which, taking into account the requirements for integration of wildlife at the planning stage of road infrastructure development, are the basis for choosing the best and simplest environmental solution that will preserve biodiversity.  by defragmentation of habitats.

Conclusion. Habitat defragmentation measures are aimed at reducing the overload of existing infrastructure, including the barrier effect.  Our analysis allows us to identify the best examples of the construction of wildlife crossings and apply progressive domestic and international experience to improve existing projects using the experience of EU developments.  Systematization of the basic technical principles of designing of biotransitions is the basis for the development of a national standard on requirements for the design of wildlife crossings on highways to define clear requirements for the design, construction, repair and maintenance of wildlife crossings for wild animals on highways.

References

  1. VBN V.2.3-218-198:2007 Proektuvannia ta budivnytstvo sporud iz metalevykh hofrovanykh konstruktsii na avtomobilnykh dorohakh zahalnoho korystuvannia (Federal building regulations                       (VBN V.2.3-218-198:2007) Design and construction of structures made of corrugated metal structures on public roads). Kyiv, 2007. 32 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  2. Gavrylenko O. Transportni heotekhsystemy yak faktor vtraty bioriznomanittia (Transport geotechnical systems as a factor of loss biodiversity). Vìsnik. Geografìâ (Kiïvsʹkij nacìonalʹnij unìversitet ìmenì Tarasa Ševčenka. Kyiv, 2017. Vol. 3(68)/4(69). P. 35-40. URL: http://visnyk-geo.univ.kiev.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/68-69_-7.pdf (Last accessed: 27.07.2020) [in Ukrainian].
  3. DBN V.2.3-22:2009 Sporudy transportu. Mosty ta truby. Osnovni vymohy proektuvannia (State Building Norms (DBN V.2.3-22:2009)  Transport facilities. Bridges and pipes. Basic design requirements). Kyiv, 2009. 52 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  4. DSTU 8751:2017 Bezpeka dorozhnoho rukhu. Ohorodzhennia dorozhni i napriamni prystroi. Pravyla vykorystannia. Zahalni tekhnichni vymohy (State Standard of Ukraine (DSTU 8751:2017) Road safety road barriers and guiding device. Rules of using. General technical requirements). Kyiv, 2019. 44 p. [in Ukrainian].
  5. DSTU 8814:2018 Transportni sporudy. Mosty avtodorozhni. Terminy ta vyznachennia poniat (State Standard of Ukraine (DSTU 8814:2018) Transport structures. Highways bridges. Terms and determinations of concepts).  Kyiv, 2019. 33 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  6. Zvit z otsinky vplyvu na dovkillia budivnytstva avtomobilnoi dorohy derzhavnoho znachennia N-31 Dnipro – Tsarychanka – Kobeliaky – Reshetylivka vid sela Loboikivka do mezhi Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti I-b tekhnichnoi katehorii z 4 smuhamy rukhu (po 2 smuhy v kozhnomu napriamku) v obkhid naselenykh punktiv Loboikivka, Petrykivka, Mohyliv, Kytaihorod, Tsarychanka, Liashkivka. 459 p. URL: http://eia.menr.gov.ua/uk/case/id-533 (Last accessed: 27.07.2020) [in Ukrainian].
  7. Rubczov A.A., Yevgenev H.I. Bioperekhody dlya zhivotnykh na avtomobilnykh dorogakh I kategorii (Biological transitions for animals on the I category roads). Meždunarodnyj studenčeskij naučnyj vestnik. Moscow, 2017. N 4 (7). URL: http://www.eduherald.ru/ru/article/view?id=17622 (Last accessed: 07.05.2020) [in Russian].
  8. SP 461.1325800.2019 Bioperekhody na obyektakhtransportnoyinfrastruktury. Pravila proyektirovaniya (Set of rules (SP 461.1325800.2019) Wildlife crossings on transport infrustructure objects. Design rules). Moscow, 2020. 25 p.  [in Russian].
  9. ODM 218.6.023-2017 Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya na uchastkakh peresecheniya avtomobilnymi dorogami putey migratsii zhivotnykh (Methodological recommendations for ensuring road safety at sections of road crossing of animal migration routes). Moscow, 2017. 39 p. (Information and documentation) [in Russian].
  10. DSTU B V.2.3-11-2004 Sporudy transportu. Ohorodzhennia dorozhnie perylnoho typu. Zahalni tekhnichni umovy (State Standard of Ukraine (DSTU B V.2.3-11-2004) Road safety. Railing. General specifications). Kyiv, 2005. 12 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  11. R V.2.3-03450778-812:2013 Rekomendatsii z vlashtuvannia bioperekhodiv dlia mihratsii tvaryn cherez avtomobilni dorohy (Rekomendations (R V.2.3-03450778-812:2013) Recommendations for the arrangement of biotransitions for the migration of animals across highways. Kyiv, 2013. 14 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  12. HBN V.2.3-218-007:2012 Sporudy transportu. Ekolohichni vymohy do avtomobilnykh dorih. Proektuvannia (Departmental Building Norms (HBN V.2.3-218-007:2012) Transport facilities. Environmental requirements for roads. Designing). Kyiv, 2012. 27 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  13. DBN V.2.3-22:2009 Sporudy transportu. Mosty ta truby. Osnovni vymohy proektuvannia (State Building Norms (DBN V.2.3-22:2009) Transport facilities. Bridges and pipes. Basic design requirements). Kyiv, 2009. 52 p. (Information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  14. COST 341 HabitatFragmentationduetoTransportationInfrastructureWildlifeandtraffic a EuropeanHandbookforIdentifyingConflictsandDesigningSolutions URL:https://handbookwildlifetraffic.info/handbook-wildlife-traffic/ (Last accessed: 05.05.2020) [in English].
  15. Iuell B., Bekker G.J., Cuperus R., Dufek J., Fry G., Hicks C., Hlavác V., Keller V.B.,                  Rosell C., Sangwine T., Tørsløv N. & Wandall B. le Maire. (Eds.). 2005. Fauna y Tráfico. Manual europeo paral aidentificación de conflictos y eldiseñodesoluciones. Organismo Autónomo Parques Nacionales. Ministeriode Medio Ambiente. Serietécnica. 166 p. URL:https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/biodiversidad/temas/ecosistemas-y-conectividad/conectividad-fragmentacion-de-habitats-y-restauracion/fragm-documentos-grupo-trabajo.aspx (Last accessed: 02.08.2020) [in Spanish].
  16. Prescripciones técnicas para el diseño de pasos de fauna y vallado sperimetrales (segunda edición, revisada y ampliada). Madrid, 2015. URL: https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/biodiversidad/publicaciones/prescripciones_pasos_vallados_2a_edicion_tcm30-195791.pdf (Last accessed: 05.05.2020) [in Spanish].
  17. Technical prescriptions for wildlife crossing and fence design (secondedition, revisedandexpanded). 2016. 123 р. URL: https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/biodiversidad/temas/ecosistemas-y-conectividad/technical_prescriptions_wildlife_crossing_tcm30-195792.pdf (Last accessed: 03.05.2020) [in English].
  18. Vander Ree, R., Smith, D.J. andGrilo, C (eds.). Handbook of Road Ecology. John Wiley & Sons.  Oxford. 2015. 552 p. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118568170 (Last accessed: 02.08.2020) [in English].