Interpretation of the english-language term «pavement» and derived complex terms

published:
Number: Issue 32(2025)
Section: Transport technology
The page spacing of the article: 348-358
Keywords: built-up area, design, maneuverability with vehicles, motor roads / streets junctions, roundabout, performance.
How to quote an article: Tatyana Tereshchenko. Interpretation of the english-language term «pavement» and derived complex terms. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2025. Issue 32. P. 348–358 [in Ukrainian].

Authors

State Enterprise «National Institute for Infrastructure Development» (SE «NIDI»), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7584-9031

Summary

Introduction. The introduction to the paper highlights the actuality of the issues of the design of roads/streets junctions within built-up areas.

Problem statement. The topic of the paper concerns the advantages, as well as general issues of design and performance of at-grade junctions including roundabouts — PRC (German: der Kreisverkehr) compared to other types of roads and streets junctions within built-up areas.

The topic of the paper concerns the advantages of PRC (English: roundabout, German: der Kreisverkehr) compared to other types of roads / streets junctions within built-up areas, as well as general issues of the design and operation of PRC.

Purpose. The purpose of the paper is a general analysis of the experience of EU countries in design of roads / streets junctions within built-up areas and highlighting solutions that are priority in terms of road user safety and the operational efficiency of such junctions.

Results. A general comparative analysis of various types of roads/streets junctions within built-up areas, including the PRC, has been carried out and the recognized advantages and basic requirements for the design and features of the PRC’s operation within built-up areas according to the experience of EU countries have been highlighted. The issue of compatibility of terms definition within the scope of the analysis was briefly reviewed.

The approaches accepted to determine the appropriateness of PRC parameters for vehicle swept paths relevant for the design of PRCs and the laying of routes for individual types of vehicles (tractor trucks with long-length semi-trailers, car carriers, other vehicles with a long base) within built-up areas have been considered. An example of organizing the route of such vehicles movement through PRCs that most significantly limit the accessibility of the road network within built-up areas for carriage vehicles has been presented.

Conclusions. Conclusions are provided on:

  • realization, according to the experience of EU countries, of contemporary solutions for roads/streets junctions within built-up areas through the construction of PRC;
  • advantages of PRC over other types of level junctions and the advisability of the PRC design evolution to increase the accessibility of the road network within built-up zones for carriage vehicles;
  • advisability of developing, at the national level, adjusted regulations regarding roundabouts design and performance within built-up areas.

References

  1. Roundabouts and other intersections. SWOV fact sheet, June 2022 SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, The Hague. 22 p. URL: https://swov.nl/sites/ default/files/bestanden/downloads/FS%20Roundabouts%20and%20other %20intersections_3.pdf  (Last accessed: 18.06.2025) [in English]
  2. Tatyana Tereshchenko. Interchange systems. Interchanges. Used terminology. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2024. Issue 30. P. 398–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36100/ dorogimosti2024.30.398 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Directives for the design of urban roads. English Version of «Richtlinien für die Anlage von Stadtstraßen», RASt 06, Edition 2006, Translation 2012. Forschungsgesellschaft für Straßen- und Verkehrswesen e.V., Köln. 131 p. URL: https://www.fgsv-verlag.de/pub/media/pdf/200_E_PDF.v.pdf (Last accessed: 16.06.2025) [in English].
  4. EUROPEAN AGREEMENT ON MAIN INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC ARTERIES (AGR) Consolidated version ECE/TRANS/SC.1/384 14 March 2008. 57 p. URL: https://unece.org/DAM/trans/conventn/ECE-TRANS-SC1-384e.pdf (Last accessed: 28.07.2023) [in English].
  5. Spahn, V. Ist der Kreisverkehr sicherer als die Lichtsignalanlage? Vortrag zum Deutschen Straßen- und Verkehrskongress 2008 (FGSV 001/22), FGSV, Köln, 12 р. URL: https://verlag.fgsv-datenbanken.de/media/upload/tagungsbaende/ FGSV_001_22/FGSV_001_22-7.pdf (Datum des letzten Besuchs: 20.06.2025) [auf Deutsch].
  6. Taglieri, D., Liu, H., Gayah, V. Network-Wide Implementation of Roundabouts VersusSignalized Intersections on Urban Streets: Analytical and Simulation Comparison. Transportation
    Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
    . 2024, Vol. 2678(5), P. 719–735. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/ 03611981231192093 (Last accessed: 18.06.2025) [in English].
  7. Wirkung von Maßnahmen zur Umweltentlastung, Teil 2: Kreisverkehre, Ausgabe 2015. Forschungsgesellschaft für Straßen- und Verkehrswesen, FGSV 210/2. 7 р. URL: http://www.trc-transportation.com/cms/images/dokumente/FGSV_210_2_ Kreisverkehre.pdf (Datum des letzten Besuchs: 20.06.2025) [auf Deutsch].
  8. Wachsmann, J., Riel, J. Internationale Verkehrsregelungen an zweistreifigen Kreisverkehren und deren Auswirkung auf die Leistungsfähigkeit. HEUREKA 2021, 18 S. URL: https://verlag.fgsv-datenbanken.de/media/upload/tagungsbaende/ FGSV_002_127/FGSV_002_127-51.pdf (Datum des letzten Besuchs: 20.06.2025) [auf Deutsch].
  9. Petru, J., Krivda, V. An Analysis of Turbo Roundabouts from the Perspective of Sustainability of Road Transportation. Sustainability. 2021, 13, 2119. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2119 (Last accessed: 17.06.2025) [in English].
  10. Robinson, B. V., Rodegerdst, L., Scarborough, W., Kittelson, W., Troutbeck, R., Brilon, V., et. al. Roundabouts: an informational guide. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Report No FHWA-RD-00-067. 2006. 284 p. URL: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ publications/research/ safety/00067/00067.pdf (Last accessed: 30.05.2025) [in English].
  11. Hedges, C.J., Dekelbab, W., Hanna, A.N., Griswold, E., Barnes, N., DiAngelis, H. Guide for roundabouts. NCHRP research Report 1043. Transportation research Board, 2023. 426 p. URL: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/27069/guide-for-roundabouts (Last accessed: 29.05.2025) [in English].
  12. Friedrich, B., Hoffmann, S., Axer, S., Niemeier, W., Tengen, D., Adams, S., u.a. Überprüfung der Befahrbarkeit innerörtlicher Knotenpunkte mit Fahrzeugen des Schwerverkehrs. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BAST), Verkehrstechnik Heft V. 245, 2014. 117 р. URL: https://bast.opus.hbz-nrw.de/opus45-bast/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/799/file/V245_ELBA_Bericht_barrierefrei.pdf (Datum des letzten Besuchs: 20.06.2025) [auf Deutsch].
  13. COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 96/5 3/EC of 25 July 1996 Laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorized dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorized weights in international traffic. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31996L0053 (Last accessed: 25.06.2025) [in English].
  14. DIRECTIVE 2002/7/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 18 February 2002 Amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32002L0007 (Last accessed: 25.06.2025) [in English].