Determination of priority inspection and repair urgency of transport structures using the software complex “Analytical expert system for bridge management”

published:
Number: Issue 31(2025)
Section: Hydrotechnical construction, water engineering and water technology
The page spacing of the article: 171-179
Keywords: highway, bridge, inspection, AESBM, software complex “Analytical Expert System for Bridge Management”, bridge rating, operational strategy, transport structure, technical condition, formalized expert assessment.
How to quote an article: Artem Bezuglіy, Volodymyr Kaskiv, Liudmyla Panibratets, Sergii Stepanov, Vladyslava Hriniv, Leonida Chaikovska. Determination of priority inspection and repair urgency of transport structures using the software complex “Analytical expert system for bridge management”. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2025. Issue 31. P. 171–179 [in Ukrainian].

Authors

State Enterprise «National Institute for Development Іnfrastructure» (SE «NIDI»), Kyiv, Ukraine
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3883-7968
State Enterprise «National Institute for Development Іnfrastructure» (SE «NIDI»), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4299-5140
State Enterprise “National Institute for Infrastructure Development” (SE “NIDI”), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0683-9299
State Enterprise “National Institute for Infrastructure Development” (SE “NIDI”), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1220-4310
State Enterprise «National Institute for Development Іnfrastructure» (SE «NIDI»), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8107-9935
State Enterprise «National Institute for Development Іnfrastructure» (SE «NIDI»), Kyiv, Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8074-6798

Summary

Introduction. Transport structures are crucial elements of critical infrastructure that contribute to economic development and ensure the security of regions and the state as a whole. During wartime, transport structures have become vital for national defense, humanitarian evacuation, and export logistics. Most transport structures on public roads were built under outdated design norms, which do not correspond to modern load requirements. Almost half of Ukraine's transport structures are over 60 years old, making their deterioration inevitable. The situation is further complicated by increased traffic loads and the accumulation of deferred repairs, leading to a decline in the technical condition of these structures. Maintaining transport structures in proper condition is primarily a matter of traffic safety and the efficient operation of transport infrastructure. The available data in the “Analytical Expert System for Bridge Management” (AESBM) software complex and its analytical modules make it a reliable and efficient management tool for maintaining transport structures.

Problem Statement. Ensuring stable transport connectivity is of great importance for the development and integration of Ukraine’s economic system into global and European structures. Today, under wartime conditions, maintaining operational infrastructure is critical for the functioning of the state and the livelihood of the population, despite limited resources.

Objective. To provide an optimal approach to planning expenditures for the maintenance and repair of transport structures based on a comprehensive analysis of their current condition.

Materials and Methods. Analytical, statistical, and systematic analysis methods were applied. Data were obtained from the AESBM software complex.

Results. The paper presents the capabilities of AESBM in forming work plans for bridge inspections and subsequent repairs, considering various factors (general, calculated, and specific) under conditions of limited funding.

Conclusions. The use of AESBM enables optimal planning of priority and timely restoration work on transport structures, maintaining them in proper condition while ensuring the rational use of financial resources. It allows for rapid assessment and determination of inspection priorities, as well as planning restoration activities. Further development and widespread implementation of AESBM’s modules for current and strategic planning will provide a more flexible approach to data preparation and optimal management decision-making.

References

  1. Larysa Bodnar Software complex AESUM. Up-to-date state and the concept of further development. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2010. Issue 12. P. 31–39 [in Ukrainian]
  2. Marusych D. Zhyttievyi tsykl budynku. 2021. URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/ 1Nms0UNTI85RxCdTAoIxpKqoeULmgJjG8/view (Last accessed: 04.03.2025) [in Ukrainian]
  3. DBN V.2.3-6:2009 Sporudy transportu. Mosty ta truby. Obstezhennia i vyprobuvannia (State Building Norms (DBN V.2.3-6:2009) Transport constructions. Bridges and pipes. Inspection and testing). Kyiv, 2009. 63 p. (information and documentation) [in Ukrainian].
  4. DSTU 9181:2022 Nastanova z otsiniuvannia ta prohnozuvannia tekhnichnoho stanu avtodorozhnikh mostiv (Guidelines for evaluating and predicting the technical condition of highway bridge). Kyiv, 2022. 52 p. (informatsiia ta dokumentatsiia) [in Ukrainian].
  5. Larysa Bodnar, Serhii Zavhorodniy, Petro Koval, Liudmyla Panibratets, Vitalii Yastrubinetskyi Research of the influence of defects of road bridge structures on their bearing capacity. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. 2020. Issue 21. P. 236–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36100/dorogimosti2020.21.236 [in Ukrainian].
  6. Larysa Bodnar, Serhii Stepanov, Vitalii Yastrubinetskyi, Serhii Zavhorodnii Repair programs development taking into account the presence of high-risk defects on bridges. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. 2021. Issue 23. P. 158–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36100/dorogimosti2021.23.158. [in Ukrainian]
  7. Larysa Bodnar, Serhii Zavhorodniy, Vitalii Yastrubinetskyi Analysis of typical designs of the most common reinforced concrete bridge span on the motor roads of Ukraine. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2020. Issue 22. P. 176–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36100/dorogimosti2020.22.176 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Larysa Bodnar, Olexandr Kanin, Serhii Stepanov, Liudmyla Panibratets. System of criteria for the importance of bridges with the possibility of adjusting their weight influences. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2023. Issue 27. P. 199–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36100/dorogimosti2023.27.199 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Saaty T. L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences. 2008. Vol. 1, No. 1. P. 83–98. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/ Muhammad-Abas/post/How-do-I-perform-AHP-on-a-hierarchy-having-more-than-two-levels/attachment/59d646d0c49f478072eaea6a/ AS%3A273837772476419%401442299420290/download/saaty_2008.pdf (Last accessed: 04.03.2025) [in English].