Lifetime engineering principles in highway asset management

Опубліковано:
Номер: Випуск 30(2024)
Розділ: Економіка. Менеджмент
Cторінковий інтервал статті: 83-95
Ключові слова: road asset management, lifetime engineering, pavement structural design, road maintenance, environmental protection.
Як цитувати статтю: Zsolt Bencze, László Gáspár. Lifetime engineering principles in highway asset management. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2024. Issue 30. P. 83–95 [in Ukrainian].
Як цитувати статтю (references): Zsolt Bencze, László Gáspár. Lifetime engineering principles in highway asset management. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges]. Kyiv, 2024. Issue 30. P. 83–95 [in Ukrainian].

Автори

KTI Hungarian Institute for Transport Sciences and Logistics Non-Profit Ltd., Budapest, Hungary
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0574-4100
KTI Hungarian Institute for Transport Sciences and Logistics Non-Profit Ltd., Budapest, Hungary
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2130-7864

Анотація

Introduction. An important tendency of our time is sustainability, good value for money and long-term planning. These are also the goals of the recently developed discipline, lifetime engineering. Although the principles of the science were originally developed for buildings and engineering structures, they can also be adapted to public roads. The article — through a case study in Hungary — presents the applicability of life engineering science to public road asset management. Besides, examples of pavement structure design, durability, maintenance-operation and environmental protection are also presented.

Problem Statement. The typical lifetime engineering science principles used in the presentation were: increasing (pavement) life cycle; complex, multi-disciplinary design methodology; modular design; effective, quality insurance methods; high level satisfaction of the customers’ needs; minimisation of lifetime costs; sustainable, end-of-life strategies. It is emphasized that lifetime engineering is based on specific basic principles that effectively promote an up-to-date approach to any discipline related to engineering infrastructure. The paper shows that the efficacy of a road asset management. can be considerably increased if some elements of lifetime engineering are utilized.

Purpose. Road asset management is a vital tool to the traffic management of every country in preserving the value of their highway network and to satisfy continuously the needs of road users at a high level.

Materials and Methods. The main principles of lifetime engineering and the major ambitions of road asset management are considered as starting point (“material”) of the paper. A case study is shown on the possible combination of the previous two sciences.

Results. The article — through a case study in Hungary — presents and proves the applicability of lifetime engineering science to public road asset management. This very fact is supported by several examples of pavement structure design, durability, road maintenance-operation and environmental protection.

Посилання

  1. Sarja A.: Principles and Solutions of the New System Building Technology (TAT). Research Report 662, 1989, Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.
  2. Sarja A., Vesikari E.: Durability Design of Concrete Structures. RILEM Report Series 14, E&FN Spon. London. 1996. 143 p. [in Englich].
  3. Sarja A.: Integrated Life Cycle Design of Structures. Spon Press, London and New York, 1996, 142 p.
  4. Gáspár L.: Lifetime Engineering for Roads. Acta Technica Jaurinensis. 1 (1), 2008. Р. 37–46.
  5. Gáspár L.: Lifetime Engineering in Road Asset Management. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Pavement and Asset Management Conference, Coimbra (Portugal), CD-ROM Proceedings, 2008. 10 p.
  6. Gáspár L.: Lifetime engineering principles and durable roads. The International Journal of Pavement Engineering and Asphalt Technology. 17(1), 2016. Р. 58–72.
  7. Gáspár L., Horvát F. and Lublóy L.: Life-time of transportation facilities. UNIVERSITAS-Győr Non-profit Kft., Győr, Hungary, 2011. 324 p. [in Hungarian].
  8. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality_function_deployment. 2019.
  9. Gáspár L.: Highway asset management. KTI Non-Profit Ltd. Publication Series No. 50. Buda-pest, 2012. 232 p. [in Hungarian].
  10. PIARC Technical Committee 4.1 Management of Road Infrastructure Assets. Activity Report. PIARC 23rd World Road Congress Paris. 2007. 20 p.
  11. Asset Management Manual. A Guide for Practitioners. World Road Association, 2017. URL: https:// www.piarc.org/en/knowledge-base/road-assets-management/Road-Asset-Management-Manual.
  12. General Concept and Requirements for Asset Management Training Courses Technical Committee D. 1 Asset Management. 2019. 64 p.
  13. ISO 55000:2014 Standard Asset management — Overview, principles and terminology. 2014. 19 p.
  14. Toth Cs., Petho L, Rosta Sz.: Rheological characterisation of bituminous binder blends for the design of asphalt mixes containing high recycled asphalt content. Acta Technica Jaurinensis. 16(2). 2023. Р. 62-74.
  15. e-UT 06.03.13 Asphalt pavement structure design and strengthening. Road Technical Inst-ructions, Hungarian Road Society, Budapest. 2005. 36 p. [in Hungarian].
  16. Juhász G: Alternative asphalt pavement design methodology and its comparison with the standadised Hungarian design method. Útügyi Lapok. 11(17). 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36246/ UL.2023.1.02 [in Hungarian].
  17. Gáspár L.: Lifetime engineering for roads (Keynote lecture). In Proceedings of CETRA 2012 (2nd International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure), Dubrovnik, 2012. Р. 25–34.
  18. Bíró Sz., Geiger A. et al.: Chemically stabilized asphalt rubber compositions and a mechano-chemical method for preparing the same. European patent application 1960472 B1. 2009.
  19. Almássy K., Gáspár L. Szentpéteri I.: Complex evaluation of Hungarian road pavement layers with chemically stabilized rubber modified binders. Az Aszfalt. 27(1). 2020. Р. 32–39. [in Hungarian].
  20. Almássy K., Geiger, A.: Use of rubber bitumen worldwide – MOL rubber modified bitumen in international comparison. Az Aszfalt. 27(2). 2020. Р. 33–39 [in Hungarian].
  21. Toth Cs., Petho L., Geiger A. Soós Z.: Performance assessment of hot mix asphalt with chemically stabilized rubber bitumen. In Proceedings of 6th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress, Prague, 2016. 10 p. DOI: https://doi.org.10.14311/EE.2016.110.
  22. EN 12697-22. Bituminous mixtures: test methods for hot mix asphalt: part 22: Wheel tracking, 2020. 29 p.
  23. e-UT 05.02.11 Requirements for road asphalt mixtures. Road Technical Instructions, Hungarian Road Society, Budapest. 2018. 53 p. [in Hungarian].
  24. Gáspár L, Tóth Cs, Almássy K, Szentpéteri I, Primusz P and Hunyadi D (2019) Complex performance evaluation of Hungarian road pavement layers with chemically stabilized rubber modified binders.  Re-search report of KTI Institute for Transport Sciences Non-Profit Ltd. and Department of Road and Railway Construction, Budapest University of Technology and Economics. 148 p. (in Hungarian)
  25. Gáspár L and Bencze Zs: (2014) Experimental sections in the Hungarian road management. In Pro-ceedings of CETRA 3rd International Conference on Road and Railway Infrastructure, Split, Croatia. Р. 183–188.
  26. Gáspár L (2016) Actual efficiency of road pavement rehabilitation. In Proceedings of CETRA 4th In-ternational Conference on Road and Railway Infrastructure, Sibenik. Croatia. Р. 181–186.
  27. Paterson WDD (1986) Prediction of Road Deterioration and Maintenance Effects: Theory and Quan-tification, Volume II, World Bank, Washington, D. C.
  28. Gáspár L (project manager) (2014) Evaluation of trial section monitoring results for road manage-ment purposes. Project report 2161-001-5-4, KTI Non-Profit Ltd., Budapest, Hungary. 96 p. [in Hungarian].
  29. Gáspár L (2008) Factors influencing the reliability of pavement performance models. In CD-ROM Proceedings of 3rd European Pavement and Asset Management Conference, Coimbra Portugal. 10 p.
  30. Gáspár L and Bencze Zs (2018) Long-life Pavements – European and American Perspectives. NBM&CW (New Building Materials & Construction World) 24(3). Р. 122–135.
  31. Parkman C. C. (1999) Transferring road maintenance to the private sector. Examples of UK experience TRL Project Report PR/OSC/157/99. 20 p.
  32. file:/Desktop/Rólunk – MKIF – Magyar Koncessziós Infrastruktúra-Fejlesztő Zrt.htm [in Hungarian].
  33. Gáspár L (2015) “Objective” Evaluation of a Highway Contractor’s Performance. International Journal of Constructive Research in Civil Engineering. 1(1). Р. 34–46.
  34. Gáspár L (2012) Evaluation of highway contractors based on the actual performance of their past projects. In Proceedings of TRA Transportation Research Arena Europe 2012. Athens. 12 p.
  35. Merrill D, van Dommelen A, Gaspar L (2006) A review of practical experience throughout Europeon deterioration in fully-flexible and semi-rigid long-life pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Special Issue Long-Life Pavements, 2(7). Р. 101–109.
  36. Bencze Zs and Gáspár L (2021) Blast furnace slag in road construction and maintenance. Dorogi і mosti [Roads and bridges] 10(23). Р. 53–59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36100/dorogimosti 2021.23.053.